Subject	Oh I agree 100%.
Posted by	SooperZ95 on December 13, 2003 at 4:16 PM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	There's also the reliability factor to determine. :-/ posted by AshsZ on December 13, 2003 at 03:38 PM
Message	The real beauty of it is, if there are things that need to be changed there is a whole community that will work to make the ECUs better.
Follow Ups	Dynojet runs today nice :) - StormShadow 13:14:28 12/13/03 Strong numbers.. Would like to see a dyno chart - AshsZ 13:19:52 12/13/03 Re: Strong numbers.. Would like to see a dyno chart - StormShadow 13:25:11 12/13/03 Does it list an a/f ratio... - Sportzcoop 13:40:25 12/13/03 Most dyno's have wideband O2 capability. Did they - AshsZ 14:23:35 12/13/03 Really? Check this on what Dp's and Test pipes do - ZBlacktt 17:35:57 12/13/03 * correction* 380 dark blue is RWHP ( not 280 ) :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 17:55:15 12/13/03 Oh and JWT chip :) ( not that I care,, lol ) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 17:58:53 12/13/03 Here's some of the other pictures - ZBlacktt 18:32:47 12/13/03 Nice numbers. Amazing torque numbers!! (n/m) - emo236 13:36:52 12/13/03 Nice numbers. What fuel were you running? (n/m) - excessive101 13:51:41 12/13/03 yes, what octane fuel were you using? That is important (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 15:23:46 12/13/03 Great run. - SooperZ95 15:21:25 12/13/03 There's also the reliability factor to determine. :-/ - AshsZ 15:38:47 12/13/03 Re: There's also the reliability factor to determine. :-/ - SR Productions (Knight Rider) 16:03:59 12/13/03 Oh I agree 100%. - SooperZ95 16:16:00 12/13/03 Ran 92 chevron premium - StormShadow 18:17:42 12/13/03 what were your mustang #s again? link us to that post - Scotts94z32 01:06:00 12/14/03 Re: what were your mustang #s again? link us to that post - StormShadow 01:39:06 12/14/03 Max RWHP was at 6300 and 6500, Max RWT was at 4500 (n/m) - StormShadow 19:10:26 12/14/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.